Barros Morales, RooseveltTapia Barros, SandraChuchuca Basantes, FernandoChuchuca Basantes, Ivan2019-06-052019-06-052018Revista Lasallista de Investigación Vol. 15 No 2 20181794-4449http://hdl.handle.net/10567/2324Introduction. The present article is focused in the research about the university syllabus, knowing its meaning, importance and limitations that can be found within the syllabus that is considered as a tool of planning and organization of cognitive, axiological aspects, that will be realized in a determined time . Objective. Decide how your work will be evaluated, in an appropriate manner. Identify and develop different resources. Structure the active work of students in their learning. Write your syllabus. Materials and methods. a mixed qualitative methodological perspective was adopted, since the interpretive components were combined with the quantitative ones in the same study with emphasis on the qualitative approach. Results 100% know what syllabus means. The second question: According to your criteria. The syllabus are considered as: A detailed program of a subject according to Figure 2 with 72%, on the other hand, 22% consider the syllabus as a written communication between the teacher of the course and students, colleagues and administrators. Conclusion. it is determined that the university syllabus acting in pedagogical sciences potentialities and limitations at the University of Guayaquil can become effective taking into account the different perspectives of teachers. discharge vs. hydrostatic head / hole diameter ratio. Through comparisons with bibliographic sources. Conclusion. The values of discharge coefficients obtained in this investigation are valid according to the study flow conditions, these being of great contribution to these structures where holes are used such as desarenadores, catchments and drains.esAcceso abiertoCorporación Universitaria LasallistaPedagogía - EstrategiasAxiologíaPlanificación curricularEvaluación académicaAprendizajeArticle