Repository logo
 

Una posible polisemia en la epistemología naturalizada

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2019

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Editorial Lasallista

Abstract

InthisarticleIpresentapossiblepolysemythatcanbeobservedamongthedefendersofscientificnaturalism,foralthoughphilosopherssuchasQuine,Dennett,andGieresharetheoriginalspiritofnaturalizedepistemologyunderthedefinitionIwillcall(D1):the success of epistemology depends on how its problems can be reduced or replaced by science,thetreatmentthateachofthesephilosophersoffersofnaturalizedepistemologydepartsfromthisprimitivedefinition,sinceeachoneprivilegescertainapproachesthatwouldnotbeacceptabletoothers,norarethoseapproachesadjustedinthesamewaytowhatD1posits.So,althoughthethreeacceptthethesisthatthenewepistemologymustexcludethemetaphysicaldiscoursethathasdominatedtraditionalepistemologyandsubstituteitforpurelyscientificprojects,thetreatmentthateachoneseparatelygivestothisthesishasimplicationsthatothersupportersofnaturalismwouldfinditindefensible.

Description

Keywords

Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Epistemología, Conductismo, Ciencia y tecnología

Citation

Revista Lasallista de Investigación–Vol. 16 No 1–2019