Una posible polisemia en la epistemología naturalizada
| dc.contributor.author | Cárdenas Castañeda, Leonardo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-06T16:37:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-06T16:37:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | InthisarticleIpresentapossiblepolysemythatcanbeobservedamongthedefendersofscientificnaturalism,foralthoughphilosopherssuchasQuine,Dennett,andGieresharetheoriginalspiritofnaturalizedepistemologyunderthedefinitionIwillcall(D1):the success of epistemology depends on how its problems can be reduced or replaced by science,thetreatmentthateachofthesephilosophersoffersofnaturalizedepistemologydepartsfromthisprimitivedefinition,sinceeachoneprivilegescertainapproachesthatwouldnotbeacceptabletoothers,norarethoseapproachesadjustedinthesamewaytowhatD1posits.So,althoughthethreeacceptthethesisthatthenewepistemologymustexcludethemetaphysicaldiscoursethathasdominatedtraditionalepistemologyandsubstituteitforpurelyscientificprojects,thetreatmentthateachoneseparatelygivestothisthesishasimplicationsthatothersupportersofnaturalismwouldfinditindefensible. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | Revista Lasallista de Investigación–Vol. 16 No 1–2019 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1794-4449 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10567/2658 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Editorial Lasallista | es_ES |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ;2019 | |
| dc.rights | Acceso abierto | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAcces | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | |
| dc.subject | Corporación Universitaria Lasallista | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Epistemología | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Conductismo | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Ciencia y tecnología | es_ES |
| dc.title | Una posible polisemia en la epistemología naturalizada | es_ES |
| dc.title.alternative | A possible polysemy in naturalized epistemology | es_ES |