La revisión por pares (“peer review”) en las revistas científicas: una revisión que demanda atención
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
2014
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Corporación Universitaria Lasallista
Resumen
The peer review is known as the best process available to evaluate the scientific papers
subjected to a revision. Great virtues are attributed to them, but also some problems
have been reported evidencing the weaknesses of such system. This article makes a
synthesis of the most important virtues, critics and possible solution strategies reported
by scientific literature in recent years. These inputs are expected to be useful for the editors,
peers and authors of scientific journals and serve as a guide to those interested in
continuing with the research work required to strengthen this evaluation system.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, Publicación científica, Revisión por pares, Bioética, Ética científica